How important is accuracy?

Laurent Ferrier recently announced that one of its sublime Galet Classic Tourbillons, serial no. 35 to be specific, achieved a superb average daily variation of just 1.29 seconds at the Besançon Observatory timing test. This makes it the best performing chronometer certified at Besançon since 2006.

The certificate for the Laurent Ferrier

And last year the Concours de Chronométrie contest was topped by Greubel Forsey and surprisingly Tissot, in their respective categories.

That brings me to the question – how important is timekeeping?

For me personally, anything below +/- 10 seconds a day is perfectly acceptable, maybe even a bit more. That is generous, I know there are collectors who obsess over +/- 1 second variation. Earlier on in my collecting I obsessively checked the variation on each of my watches and even contemplating buying a timing machine. But that phase passed many years ago. Now I am not exceptionally picky about timekeeping in general. That’s mainly for practical reasons; I typically don’t wear a watch continuously for long enough for it to accumulate a significant variation.  Measuring the daily variation of watches is like the performance of supercars, where the fraction of a second shaved off the 0-100 km/h sprint is something to boast about. But practically speaking it is quite meaningless, unless the variation adds up to minutes a week. I prefer to take a wider view of movements rather than focusing on timekeeping. My view is that a well designed and constructed movement will, on average, keep better time than a badly executed calibre. The exceptional timekeeping like that achieved by the Laurent Ferrier no. 35 is due to special care in adjustment as well as some luck. Of course this was possible because the calibre is an excellent one in the first place. So for me personally it is more important to search for superb calibres, rather than specific examples of superb timekeepers. The Laurent Ferrier no. 35 or any other super well adjusted watch will not keep the same time after several years or an overhaul. Those timing results are transient things.

– SJX

Back to top.

You may also enjoy these.

Lange on the rocks

Lange recently presented some beautiful photos of its watches on minerals extracted from the Ore Mountains of Saxony, now housed at the Technical University of Freiburg. Saxony once had a rich mining industry, which was the basis of the wealth of the Saxon kings. Interestingly, FA Lange established Lange in 1845 because the economy of Glashütte was suffering due to the closure of the nearby silver mines. There’s nothing horologically novel here, but the photos are beautiful, as are the watches. All the 2012 novelties are shown in this series of photos, including the new Datograph Up/Down. – SJX

Lange 1 Tourbillon Perpetual Calendar on serpentinite

Another view of the Lange 1 Perpetual Calendar
The iconic Lange 1 in yellow gold on amethyst
Platinum Lange 1 Moonphase on serpentinite
Lange 1 Timezone on agate
Grande Lange 1 on zinnwaldite

 

Lange 1 Daymatic on silver ore
Saxonia Thin on zinnwaldite
Datograph Up/Down on topaz
Back to top.

You may also enjoy these.

Welcome to the new Watches By SJX.

Subscribe to get the latest articles and reviews delivered to your inbox.

Exit mobile version